Key points:
  • The Lovell telescope's closure is seen as shortsighted, harming both science and diplomacy.
  • Margaret Thatcher's policies from the 1980s are cited as a precedent for current funding issues.
  • UKRI’s budget has shifted focus away from research councils to industry-focused funding.

Impact on Science Facilities

The decision to cease funding the Lovell telescope at Jodrell Bank Observatory from March 2028 is being widely condemned as shortsighted and potentially harmful. The observatory's role extends beyond astronomy, serving as a symbol of UK scientific leadership and fostering science diplomacy. Closure of this iconic facility would weaken its ability to contribute significantly to radio astronomy projects.

As a PhD researcher at Jodrell Bank in the 1960s, George Kildare Miley, Emeritus professor of astronomy from Leiden University, the Netherlands, recalls firsthand how innovations at Jodrell transformed radio astronomy. The Lovell telescope played a pioneering role in developing long-baseline radio interferometry, linking separate telescopes together to create virtual telescopes thousands of miles across. Removing the Lovell telescope from this network would weaken its ability to produce pictures of the radio universe with sharpness comparable to that achieved by billion-pound space observatories such as Hubble.

Historical Context

British Science Funding Crisis Sparks Wide-Spread Concern
British Science Funding Crisis Sparks Wide-Spread Concern

The current funding crisis in British research dates back to the 1980s. In the late 1980s, Mick Foster from Chelmsford, Essex, served briefly as an economic adviser to the chief scientist at the Cabinet Office. According to Foster, the policy was to rate research funding on objective criteria such as the number of peer-reviewed publications and citations, with a focus on near-term economic benefits.

However, he argued that there was no methodology for assessing which research would turn out to be economically beneficial, and the attempt to quantify success by counting publications had counterproductive effects. This approach aimed to ensure funding went to research expected to have immediate economic benefits but backfired in fostering a high-stress atmosphere and pressure to publish too much and too soon.

Current Budget Realities

The UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) budget is expected to rise to £10 billion by 2030. However, UKRI consists of research councils, which mostly fund fundamental science, plus Innovate UK, which funds only companies. The latter’s budget has risen significantly, while the former's has plummeted by up to 40-50% in real terms since 2011. As universities also capture a higher proportion of grants through overheads, the amount of actual science being funded is even lower.

This shift means that universities are now capturing a larger share of available grants through overheads, reducing the amount actually spent on scientific research. The flow of postdoctoral fellows needed to work in innovative industries is consequently being choked.

Consequences and Future Outlook

The reduction in funding for research councils is impacting postdoctoral fellows who play crucial roles in innovative industries. Critics warn that this could lead to a generation of UK scientists being sidelined from cutting-edge projects like the Large Hadron Collider beauty (LHCb) upgrade, which has been significantly impacted by funding cuts. They argue that restoring these funds would not only enhance technological development but also maintain UK leadership in international scientific collaborations.

Paula Collins, deputy spokesperson for LHCb at Cern, highlights that withdrawing previously secured funding risks cutting off a generation of UK scientists from the future of one of Cern’s four flagship experiments. The investment represents less than 0.05% of the UK's £10 billion annual research budget and should be swiftly restored to maintain international scientific collaborations and technological development.

The editorial from The Guardian criticizes this shortsighted attitude, emphasizing that modern astronomy now encompasses physics, chemistry, biology, and computing. Jodrell Bank Observatory has long been a symbol of UK scientific leadership and hope, and its closure would be detrimental. Ministers should reconsider their stance and recognize the importance of supporting fundamental science for long-term innovation and international collaborations.

Source: The Guardian


Science Daily

143 posts

Related post