Key points:
  • Children who open social media accounts at the start of secondary school tend to score lower in mathematics and reading tests compared to those who delay.
  • The performance gap is equivalent to about six months of learning, with the effect more pronounced in math than in Italian.
  • Researchers suggest that constant checking of updates on smartphones may be a significant distraction for students.
  • Experts recommend focusing on making social media less addictive rather than implementing age bans.

Key Findings from the Study

A new study, published in Nature Human Behaviour, reveals that children who open social media accounts at the start of secondary school tend to perform worse in mathematics and reading tests compared to their peers who delay opening such accounts. The research found that these students scored lower by the equivalent of approximately six months of schooling at age 16.

The study does not conclusively prove causation, but Dr. Marco Gui, the first author of the study from the University of Milano-Bicocca in Italy, suggests that social media platforms may be problematic during pre-adolescence. He explains that one potential mechanism could involve the constant state of alertness social media creates on young users.

Study Reveals Link Between Early Social Media Use and Lower School Performance
Study Reveals Link Between Early Social Media Use and Lower School Performance

Gui notes, 'One of the mechanisms is the continuous state of alert that social media used on a smartphone exerts on minors’ lives. The continuous need to check messages can mean being less present in physical spaces and less engaged in tasks like homework.'

The performance gap was more pronounced in mathematics than in Italian, which the students were learning as a foreign language. According to Gui, this difference might be due to greater exposure to English on social media platforms.

Policy Implications

The findings come at a time when policymakers are considering measures such as age limits or bans. In the UK, there is a push to introduce a ban on social media use for under-16s, following similar actions in Australia last year. Dr. Gui suggests that while an age limit might be necessary, efforts should also focus on making these platforms less addictive and more user-friendly.

Dr. Dennis Ougrin, a professor of child and adolescent psychiatry at Queen Mary University of London, agrees with the need for healthy habits when interacting with social media. He advises, 'The message for parents, educators, and policymakers is not necessarily to ban social media but to support young people in developing healthy habits.'

The study comes as part of a broader trend of research highlighting the potential negative impacts of early social media use on academic performance. The work by Gui and his colleagues analysed surveys on the social media habits of more than 5,000 Italian schoolchildren and their results in standardised maths, Italian and English exams.

When tested at age 13 to 14, those who had opened their first social media account at 11 or 12 scored worse than those who waited until at least 14 years old. The score gap at age 15 to 16 remained the same for Italian and widened for maths. Writing in Nature Human Behaviour, the researchers say the difference in scores is roughly equivalent to the early adopters falling behind by six months of schooling.

One of the best predictors of the performance gap was how often children picked up their phones throughout the day and night, suggesting that constantly checking social media was at least partly to blame. Gui favours an age limit on social media but believes a ban is an 'emergency policy' and that work should focus on making platforms less addictive and more user-friendly.

The researcher stresses the need for ongoing efforts in educating young people about healthy habits when using these platforms, emphasizing that while an age limit might be necessary, it alone may not solve the underlying issues.

Source: The Guardian


Science Daily

145 posts

Related post