- Adura, a joint venture between Shell and Equinor, plans the Jackdaw gasfield but expects only 27 direct full-time jobs.
- Campaigners argue that the economic benefits of exploiting North Sea fields are minimal despite industry claims.
- The gasfield will support additional jobs in the supply chain, according to Adura, but critics doubt these promises.
- Environmental concerns and potential carbon emissions from Jackdaw and Rosebank are significant issues highlighted by campaigners.
Key Facts About Jackdaw Gasfield
New documents reveal that the Jackdaw gasfield, one of the last major remaining fields in the North Sea, would only create 27 direct full-time jobs according to Adura, a joint venture between Shell and Equinor. This news has sparked debate over the economic benefits of further oil and gas exploration.
Industry and Political Support

The fossil fuel industry, along with political parties including Conservatives, Reform UK, and parts of Labour, is advocating for Jackdaw and Rosebank to be approved by incoming Prime Minister Andy Burnham. Some media reports suggested that Burnham might announce new drilling permits soon.
Employment and Economic Impact
While Adura claims the projects will support 3,500 jobs during peak construction phases and 880 well-paid positions throughout production in UK communities, green campaigners argue that these benefits are minimal. An environmental impact assessment by Adura suggests that while Jackdaw will create some employment, much of the work is likely to be remote or outsourced.
Campaigner Critiques
Angharad Hopkinson from Greenpeace stated that fossil fuel cheerleaders often use employment claims as a justification for new developments. She noted that Adura's own documents tell a different story. Tessa Khan from Uplift added, 'These are companies that have made obscene profits while our energy costs have skyrocketed.'
Environmental and Tax Concerns
The environmental impact assessment for Rosebank highlights significant greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to 70% of the UK's annual emissions. Fatih Birol, a leading energy economist, told The Guardian that opening these fields would do little for UK energy security. Campaigners also criticized industry claims about tax revenues from the projects and their potential economic benefits.
Conclusion
The debate over Jackdaw gasfield highlights ongoing tensions between environmental concerns and industrial lobbying in the UK's North Sea oil and gas sector. While supporters argue for the economic importance of these developments, critics remain skeptical about both job creation and long-term benefits.
Source: The Guardian





