- Tehran responds to US strikes by targeting allied nations like Qatar and Kuwait.
- US intelligence reports suggest Iran retains 70% of its prewar missile stockpile despite bombing campaign.
- Continued military escalation risks international condemnation and could lead to dangerous retaliation in the Gulf.
Background to the Story
The conflict between Iran and the United States has escalated for six consecutive nights, with both sides displaying a willingness to engage in high-intensity attacks. The latest wave of US strikes, involving missiles launched from various military assets like jets, drones, and warships, targeted Iranian ports and strategic locations such as highways and bridges near Bandar Abbas. In response, Iran launched retaliatory attacks against its perceived allies, including Qatar, Bahrain, and particularly Kuwait.
Iran's Persistent Capabilities
Despite the claims of significant military damage by US forces during a 38-day bombing campaign in spring, US intelligence reports indicate that Iran has managed to retain substantial operational capability. According to leaked assessments, about 70% of Iran’s prewar missile stockpile and launchers were still active as recently as May.

These findings challenge the narrative presented by President Trump, who claimed a 91% reduction in Iranian weapons. The persistence of these capabilities suggests that while destruction can occur on a surface level through airstrikes, disabling underground or concealed facilities is far more difficult and time-consuming.
Impact on Oil Markets and Regional Stability
The ongoing conflict has had noticeable impacts on regional stability and oil prices. Two oil tankers were hit by missiles in the Gulf of Oman, leading to a reduction in daily transit through the Strait of Hormuz to three by Thursday – the lowest since May. The price of Brent crude oil also saw a significant increase from $75.50 to $82.
The US has reimposed its own blockade in the Gulf of Oman, with limited success. The challenge for both sides now lies in how they navigate potential military escalation without causing widespread disruption or inviting international condemnation.
Future Prospects and Dangers
A White House official has noted that while there is no clear strategy to de-escalate the situation, a frustrated US may explore more aggressive tactics. However, such actions could invite international criticism as they might be deemed war crimes.
The possibility of Iran further retaliating against US interests or allies remains high, especially with reports of strikes on critical infrastructure like desalination plants in Kuwait. The complexity and interconnected nature of the conflict suggest that any escalation is likely to be fraught with risks for both sides.
Experts like Michael Carpenter highlight the potential for a shorter but equally intense cycle of military action as compared to earlier engagements, due to the depleted resources on both sides. However, the underlying issue – whether either party can deliver a decisive victory without unacceptable costs – remains unresolved.
Source: The Guardian





