- The U.S. launched its 11th consecutive attack on Iran, escalating a conflict that has no easy resolution.
- Vali Nasr explains the miscalculation behind Trump’s decision to bomb Iran and the difficulty of achieving regime change.
- Economic repercussions are spreading globally, with potential for oil prices to rise and global growth to slow.
The Escalation of Conflict
On Wednesday, less than 48 hours after assuming office, British Prime Minister Andy Burnham held his first conversation with U.S. President Donald Trump. The dialogue began with seemingly innocuous topics such as football and the city of Manchester but quickly turned to the contentious issue of Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz. This maritime chokepoint is vital for 20% of global oil shipments, making it a key battleground in the ongoing conflict.
A Miscalculated War

Professor Vali Nasr from Georgetown University provides insight into Trump’s misstep, stating that “in his mind, this was a legacy-building transformation that would be quick and cost-free.” However, Nasr argues that Trump drastically underestimated Iran’s resilience. The U.S.-led airstrikes have not only failed to bring about regime change but also risked escalating the conflict into a wider regional war. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth estimated the cost at $37.5 billion, highlighting the financial strain on both nations.
Global Economic Impact
The fallout from this conflict extends far beyond its borders. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz is sending shockwaves through global markets. Vali Nasr warns that if no agreement can be reached by 2027, global economic growth could decline by as much as 1.3%. Europe, which has increasingly relied on Middle Eastern gas supplies since the Russia-Ukraine conflict, may face shortages and higher energy prices.
Future of Navigation
The U.S. proposal to charge tolls for ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz highlights a disregard for international law. This approach could lead to increased militarization of other shipping routes as nations seek to protect their interests, Nasr suggests. The potential for other countries to use similar strategies to control their own waterways raises concerns about a broader shift towards protectionism in maritime commerce.
Conclusion
The ongoing conflict between the U.S. and Iran over the Strait of Hormuz has significant implications for global stability and economic health. As negotiations continue, the stakes are high, with both nations facing potential long-term consequences if they fail to find a resolution that restores freedom of navigation and avoids further escalation.
Source: The Guardian





