- Kenya refused to ratify a bilateral defence agreement, leading to cancellation of UK training exercises.
- The disagreement includes issues over funding and jurisdiction for criminal offences.
- A British Ministry of Defence spokesperson expressed regret but remains committed to the partnership.
- Disputes surrounding the presence of British troops in Kenya have led to ongoing tensions.
Key Issues Leading to Cancellation
The British army has been forced to cancel a training exercise in Kenya after the Kenyan government refused to ratify a bilateral defence agreement. According to the Kenyan news outlet the Daily Nation, this dispute centers on which cases Kenya will retain primary jurisdiction over and the amount of money Britain pays for hosting the training camp.
Kenya’s national assembly's defence committee chair, Nelson Koech, emphasized the need for stronger accountability measures. These include jurisdiction over serious offences and enhanced protection for local communities. The cancellation of the planned exercise by an unspecified battalion was due to begin in a specific month but has now been relocated elsewhere.
Engagement and Alternatives
A Ministry of Defence spokesperson stated that despite the cancellation, the UK remains committed to its defence partnership with Kenya. The planned exercise, which was to take place in an unspecified location, will be conducted at an alternative location outside Kenya due to necessary licences not being forthcoming.

The spokesperson emphasized the importance of maintaining this relationship and highlighted the economic benefits for both countries. However, the cancellation has caused disappointment among those who would have benefited from the economic activity generated by the exercise.
Background and Ongoing Tensions
This decision comes amid longstanding issues with the continued presence of British troops in Kenya. A recent report to the Kenyan parliament into the base at BATUK (British Army Training Unit Kenya) alleged human rights violations, environmental damage, and sexual abuse by British soldiers.
The most high-profile case involves a person who has been charged with murder, but specific names are not provided. The case is particularly contentious as Kenya retains jurisdiction over the matter, and an extradition hearing is scheduled for November 2023. Robert Purkiss, the accused, denies the single charge.
Legal proceedings had stalled since the incident occurred before 2013 but advanced under John Healey’s tenure as defence secretary. As shadow defence secretary, he called on the previous government to do more to progress the case.
Committee Pressures and Future Prospects
Koech highlighted the committee's calls for stronger accountability measures, including jurisdiction over serious offences, enhanced protection for local communities, and implementation of recommendations from an earlier inquiry into the base’s activities. The UK government remains committed to its defence partnership with Kenya.
The spokesperson stated: “The UK highly values its relationship with Kenya, which is underpinned by mutual benefit, respect and cooperation. The UK-Kenya Defence Partnership is one of the great strengths of our relationship.”
Koech also noted that there has been sustained pressure from Kenyan people opposed to the British army’s continued presence.
Conclusion
The cancellation of training exercises between Britain and Kenya underscores the complexity of international military cooperation and the challenges of balancing mutual benefits with local concerns. Despite these ongoing tensions, both governments are actively engaging to address these outstanding issues and find a mutually acceptable solution that addresses both nations' interests.
Source: The Guardian





