- The French Open has become the first grand slam to offer players a share of tournament revenue.
- This move is seen as increasing pressure on other grand slams, particularly the US Open.
- Players seek guaranteed prize money formulas based on revenue sharing, aiming for 16% in 2023, rising to 22% by 2030.
Significant Step Forward in Prize Money Debate
The French Open has taken a bold step towards resolving the long-standing dispute over prize money among major tennis tournaments. At Wimbledon last fortnight, officials from Roland Garros presented their players' representative with an innovative proposal: sharing tournament revenue as part of the prize package.

While the agreement remains pending, this move positions the French Open distinctly from its peers. Unlike other grand slam tournaments, which have continued to offer substantial increases in prize money but without a formalized revenue-sharing model, Roland Garros is now considering a new paradigm that could significantly impact player welfare and tournament dynamics.
Player Advocates for Revenue Sharing
Debbie Jevans, chair of the All England Club, previously criticized the concept during Wimbledon, stating it made no sense to use revenue to determine prize money. This attitude sparked a media boycott threat from players before being withdrawn. The French Open’s approach appears more inclusive and forward-thinking, offering not just financial benefits but also enhancing player engagement through greater involvement in tournament management.
Pressure on US Open
The French Open's commitment to revenue sharing creates additional pressure on the US Open, which is set to announce its prize fund next month. The players are pushing for a more equitable distribution model across all four grand slams, demanding 16% of each tournament’s revenue be allocated as prize money immediately, with that figure increasing to 22% by 2030.
The US Open has already seen significant increases in recent years—last year's $90 million prize pot marked a 20% rise from the previous year. If this trend continues, it could lead to even higher prize pools for players. However, the current disparity and lack of guaranteed formulas are causing frustration among top players like Jannik Sinner, who have threatened to boycott certain events unless substantial progress is made.
Implications for Other Grand Slams
This development at Roland Garros signals a shift towards more collaborative models in tennis. It is likely that other grand slams will be compelled to reevaluate their prize distribution policies, potentially leading to broader reforms within the sport. The French Open’s bold move could set a new standard for player-organizer relations and financial transparency in major sporting events.
Source: The Guardian





